Legal Opinion

State v. Criddle

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 4, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavid E. Blair, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Pemiscot County, entered against appellant upon his plea of guilty. It is conceded appea[ iies m such case. [State v. Rosenblatt, 185 Mo. 119, 83 S. W. 975, and cases cited; State v. Siegel, 265 Mo. 239, 177 S. W. 353, and cases cited.]

The information originally contained two counts. The second count was dismissed and need not be noticed. Several persons were joined as defendants, but the ease was dismissed as to all such defendants, except the appellant. Said count charged that appellant, on or about October 30, 1921, drove an automobile while…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. KelmSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. State v. RosenblattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  3. State v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. City of Pilot Grove v. McCormickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. State v. SiegelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. WymoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. State v. TalkenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. State ex rel. Morton v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. State Ex Rel. Stage Lines Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. State ex rel. Kansas City v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API