Bank of Meno v. Coulter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JONES, C.
This is a suit in equity to enjoin the collection of two judgments which were originally obtained by the Oklahoma State Bank of Enid, which without attempting to enforce the same, after their procurement, assigned them to the plaintiff in error. The basis of the judgments were two promissory notes of $1,000 each, fraudulently obtained from the defendant in error for stock in the Gerónimo Motor Company. The agents who procured these notes from the defendant in error, Coulter, made their headquarters at the Bank of Meno, plaintiff in error herein, and were aided and abetted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Trentman v. EldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Johnson v. GibsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Church v. RulandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- American Bonding Co. v. LoebWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Clark v. . McNealNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gruntal v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Kotzman v. ConditSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Owens v. Southwestern Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Bank of Quapaw v. FlintSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.