Legal Opinion

Kotzman v. Condit

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 16, 1934No. 22833PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was brought by August Kotzman against AY. O. Condit and Pigin Condit to recover on a negotiable promissory note and to foreclose a real estate mortgage securing it. Prom a judgment for the defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

There is no serious conflict in the material facts, which may be summarized as follows:

The Graves Farm Loan Investment Company, which will be referred to hereafter as “the Investment Company,’’ had its principal office in Pittsburg, Kan., and was engaged in the business of making and negotiating mortgage securities. The plaintiff lived at Frontenac, Kan., and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Minneapolis Threshing MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Foster v. Augustanna College & Theological SeminarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Pitman v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Loomis v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Tulsa Ice Co. v. LileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hunt Trust Estate v. KikerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Commerce Union Bank v. Burger-In-A-Pouch, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sweet v. Watson's NurseryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Phelps v. MaloneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Abraham v. MikeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API