Legal Opinion

Gruntal v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1930PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

The plaintiffs are stockbrokers, members of the New York Stock Exchange. Louis Katz and Cassie Lewin, of the firm of Katz, Lewin & Wiener, were customers. On April 17, 1928, and thereafter, Katz delivered to the plaintiffs to sell for his account three $1,000 New York Railways six per cent bonds, two $1,000 Detroit-International Bridge Company seven per cent bonds, and three $1,000 Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Company six per cent bonds. The bonds were ¿old and the purchase price credited to his account, of which he received part in cash, leaving a balance due when his account was closed May…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vosburgh v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Casey v. . KastelNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Hibbs v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Turnbull v. Longacre BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Scollans v. E. H. Rollins & SonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Union BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. First National Bank of Blairstown v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. City of New Port Richey v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  4. Belmar Trucking Corp. v. American Trust Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1970
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Walston & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1967

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API