Legal Opinion

Deckant v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1951No. 32461PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

There is but one question before this court. Did the trial court err to plaintiff’s prejudice in granting defendant’s special request to charge the jury before argument, as follows:

“The court instructs you, as a matter of law, that the city of Cleveland is not an insurer of the safety of persons in the use of its streets. The city is not obliged to keep its streets in such condition that it is impossible for accidents to happen. The city cannot be held responsible for injuries caused by every depression, difference in grade, or unevenness in the streets.”

The present case was tried upon the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wymer-Harris Construction Co. v. GlassOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Cordish v. BloomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smith v. FlesherOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Mikula v. TailorsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Youssef v. Parr, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. American Louisiana Pipe Line Co. v. KennerkOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Shepherd v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API