Legal Opinion
Mikula v. Tailors
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1970No. 69-324PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I
Schneider, J.
The defendant unsuccessfully requested the trial court to give the following special instruction concerning false testimony of' a witness:
“I hereby charge you that if you find from the evidence that any witness has wilfully testified falsely to any material fact, you are free to assume that he or she testified falsely about all matters to which he or she testified, and you are at liberty to disregard the whole or any part of the testimony of such witness.”
A falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus instruction is permissible, if at all, only where an apparent conscious falsity is uttered…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sidle v. HumphreyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Smith v. FlesherOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Debie v. Cochran Pharmacy-Berwick, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
- Jeswald v. HuttOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Snyder v. StanfordOhio Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Presley v. City of NorwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- LaCourse v. FleitzOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Scott & White Memorial Hospital v. FairTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Sharon L. Batesole, Administratrix of the Estate of Lawrence L. Batesole, Deceased v. Jack E. StratfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Baldauf v. Kent State UniversityOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.