Legal Opinion

Smith v. Flesher

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1967No. 41122PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taft, G. J.

In Zink v. Contris, supra (116 Ohio App. 95), it was held that an error in refusing to give a special request to charge before argument would not support a reversal unless it affirmatively appeared that the appellant was prejudiced by that error; and that, since the error there involved related only to the issue of contributory negligence and there was “no showing of error in the submission of the issue of defendant’s negligence to the jury” and the jury’s “general verdict was consistent with a determination of the jury * * * that the defendant was not negligent,” there was no…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hallworth v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. H. E. Culbertson Co. v. WardenOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Bradley v. Mansfield Rapid Transit, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Makranczy v. GelfandOhio Supreme Court · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. WadeOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hampel v. Food Ingredients Specialties, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Niskanen v. Giant Eagle, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API