Legal Opinion
Advanced Technology Corp. v. Eliskim, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 3, 2000No. 1:96CV755PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALDRICH, District Judge.
On February 28, 2000, this Court issued an order granting summary judgment in part and denying summary judgment in part. Currently before the Court is defendant. Eliskim’s motion for reconsideration. (Doc. # 80). Eliskim asks this ■ Court to reconsider its ruling that there are disputed issues of fact regarding whether plaintiff Advanced Technology Corportation (“ATC”) can claim the innocent landowner defense in CERCLA § 107(b), which would allow ATC to pursue a § 107(a) cost recovery action against Eliskim, and this Court’s ruling that Eliskim does…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Alcan Aluminum, Inc. Champion Auto Generator Service, Inc. International Flavors and Fragrances, Inc. Kalama Chemical, Inc. Schultz Electroplating, Inc. S & W Waste, Inc. McAdoo Associates, Inc. Payso, Inc. Edward L. Payer Noreen Payer v. At & T Technologies, Inc. Cps Chemicals Company, Inc. East Coast Pollution Control, Inc. Knoll International, Inc. Lehigh Structural Steel Company John E. Potochny Beatrice/hunt Wesson, Inc. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company 21 International, Inc. Special Metals Corporation Activated Metals & Chemicals, Inc. Teledyne Vasco, a Division of Teledyne Industries, Inc. Teledyne Wah Chang Huntsville, a Division of Teledyne Industries, Inc. Witco Corporation, on Behalf of Itself and the Richardson Company Cbp Resources First Valley Bank, the Trustees of the McAdoo Associates Site Trust Fund ("The Trustees"), Proposed IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Charter International Oil Company, Acushnet Company, Proposed Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. 150 Acres of Land, More or Less, Located in Medina County, Ohio,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Lincoln Properties, Ltd. v. HigginsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1992
- Advanced Technology Corp. v. Eliskim, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
3Cited by3 opinions
- Castaic Lake Water Agency v. Whittaker Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Adobe Lumber, Inc. v. HellmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- United States v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001