Legal Opinion

Morley v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 16, 2009No. 07-15840PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Christopher and Arden Morley (the “Morleys”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their defamation and defamation per se claims against all defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”) and the magistrate judge’s grant of summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (“Rule 56”) with respect to all of their other claims against Steve and Kristine Alessio (the “Alessios”), and Harry and Ruth Tod-ice (the “Todices”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(3). We affirm.

1. We review de novo a district…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miller v. Yokohama Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Annette Thomas v. City of Beaverton Linda Adlard Sandra MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation v. City of MontereyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Garaux v. PulleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Green Acres Trust v. LondonArizona Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. (PS) Conerly v. Veracity Research CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. Euro Motor Sport Inc. v. ARB Las VegasDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API