Andreanoff v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BRYNER, Cj\, and COA 1 'S and SINGLETON, JJ. SINGLETON, Judge.
In this appeal, we are asked to decide.^ two questions regarding the proper interpretation of AS 12.40.080. First, may a grand jury, sua sponte, reconsider a decision to return a “no true bill” and hear new evidence? And, second, if it may, was its decision to do so in this case coerced by the prosecution?
On June 21, 1985, a grand jury was convened to consider a proposed indictment charging Charles Andreanoff with a single count of first-degree murder in violation of AS 11.41.100(a)(1). The prosecutor read the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- People v. WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969
- United States v. John E. McKenzie Dale Bonura, Stephen Farrar, Stephen Reboul, Ronald F. Brink, Thomas R. Woodall and Richard LeblancCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. StrattonAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Ephamka v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1994
- Smith v. StrattonAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. EcholsCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
- State v. EcholsCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990