Legal Opinion

Crabtree v. Paulus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1984No. SC S30159PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This petition concerns the same ballot title examined in Remington v. Paulus, 296 Or 317, 675 P2d 485 (1984). Petitioners argue that the original title was insufficient or unfair because it created the impression that evidence seized in violation of the federal constitution would be admissible in criminal prosecutions. We believe that the modified ballot title answers this objection. They also argue that this title failed to advise the citizenry of the state that they are giving up a powerful tool and forfeiting several constitutional protections. Statements about the effect of proposed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Remington v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reed v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Wells v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Carley/Towers v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Remington v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Morgan v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API