Legal Opinion

Fithian-Barrett v. Paulus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1984No. SCS30487PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner challenges a ballot title prepared by the Attorney General for a proposed initiative petition.

The initiative petition proposes to amend three sections of Article I of the Oregon Constitution, specifically section 9, which guarantees the right of the people to be secure against unreasonable searches or seizures, section 11, insofar as it guarantees the right to counsel in criminal prosecutions, and section 12, which forbids placing a person twice in jeopardy for the same offence or compelling anyone to testify against himself in any criminal prosecution. 1 The initiative petition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holmes v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Wells v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Inc. v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Oregon Taxpayers Union v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reed v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ferry v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kouns v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Oregon State Homeowner's Ass'n v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Gtech Corp. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API