Legal Opinion
Raynor v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 29, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-951PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BISSELL, District Judge.
The present lawsuit arises out of a complaint filed on March 7, 1984 by Dora M. Raynor, charging defendants with negligence and negligent misrepresentations. Defendants named in this action are the United States of America, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, John Doe, an unknown individual retained by HUD to properly maintain the subject property, Town and Country Realty, Inc., Stanford Slovin, and the Clarion Mortgage Company. As relief, plaintiff seeks compensatory damages of $4,060.31 together with interest, costs of suit and attorney’s fees.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McDonald v. MianeckiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Onilea Neal v. Robert BerglandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Gregory Jordan v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richey v. PatrickWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Rzepiennik v. US Home Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Fuller v. Banknorth Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Roseberry v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1990
- Richey v. PatrickWyoming Supreme Court · 1995