McDonald v. Mianecki
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pashman, J.
In this case, we are called upon to decide whether an implied warranty of workmanship and habitability arises upon the sale of a home by a builder-vendor, and, if so, whether potability of the water supply is included within the realm of warranted items. For the reasons given herein, we conclude that both questions must be answered in the affirmative. A further issue is raised regarding the plaintiff’s duty to mitigate damages.
I
Factual Background
In 1972 Joseph Mianecki, one of the defendants herein, placed a newspaper advertisement in which…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Humber v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Waggoner v. Midwestern Development, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Sewell v. GregoryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Strawn v. CanusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.