Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Mianecki

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 6, 1979PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pashman, J.

In this case, we are called upon to decide whether an implied warranty of workmanship and habitability arises upon the sale of a home by a builder-vendor, and, if so, whether potability of the water supply is included within the realm of warranted items. For the reasons given herein, we conclude that both questions must be answered in the affirmative. A further issue is raised regarding the plaintiff’s duty to mitigate damages.

I

Factual Background

In 1972 Joseph Mianecki, one of the defendants herein, placed a newspaper advertisement in which…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Humber v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  4. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Waggoner v. Midwestern Development, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Sewell v. GregoryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. Strawn v. CanusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API