Legal Opinion

Darlington v. Studebaker-Packard Corp.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 10, 1961No. 1446PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRANT, District Judge.

This patent case was commenced on December 31, 1952 and dismissed, for failure to prosecute, on June 6, 1957.. *439This dismissal was affirmed by the Court of Appeals on January 2, 1959, Darlington v. Studebaker-Packard Corp., 7 Cir., 1959, 261 F.2d 903.

On June 12, 1957, six days after the entry of the dismissal order in the trial court, defendant filed a Bill of Costs. On June 21, 1957, pursuant to Title 28 U.S. C.A. § 1924 the defendant filed an affidavit verifying the costs contained in this Bill. After the affirmance of the dismissal by the Seventh Circuit a supplemental…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Jay E. Darlington v. Studebaker-Packard CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  3. Laufenberg, Inc. v. Goldblatt Bros., IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  4. Electric Candy Machine Co. v. MorrisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1905
  5. Kenny v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hairline Creations, Inc. v. Diane KefalasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Young v. ByrneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Oak Materials Group, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
  5. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API