Legal Opinion
Jay E. Darlington v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 2, 1959No. 12387PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Circuit Judge.
On December 31, 1952, Jay E. Darling-ton, plaintiff-appellant, as assignee of a certain design patent, filed an action against the predecessor of Studebaker-Packard Corporation, 1 defendant-appel-lee, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, charging infringement of such patent with a prayer for an accounting of profits and damages arising therefrom. Since the chronology of subsequent steps taken in the case below leading to this appeal is important, we list those steps in proper sequence:(1) On February 20, 1953,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- William J. Green, Jr. v. Honorable John W. Murphy, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Carr v. FifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Henry C. Jones and Virgie Jones v. Celessie Jones, Also Known as Celeste JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Cromelin v. MarkwalterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Tallulah Morgan v. John J. Kerrigan, Boston Home and School Association, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant, Kevin H. White, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Dr. Milton Margoles v. Alida Johns and the Journal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- National Auto Brokers Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- William Link v. Wabash Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Kinnear-Weed Corp. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.