Legal Opinion

Estrada v. Queen Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1930No. Docket No. 108PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, J.

This is an action on a contract of insurance. On or about June 10, 1927, at Brawley, California, the defendant insurance company, through its agent, issued a policy of fire insurance to F. N. Estrada, covering certain pool-hall fixtures and equipment. The property-covered was destroyed by fire early in the morning of July 5, 1927. There is evidence that on that day Estrada notified the agents of the insurance company that the property had been destroyed by fire during the previous night. On July 7, 1927, one E. L. Thomas, an adjuster for said insurance company, arrived at Brawley, and was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheaton v. North British and Merchantile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Carroll v. Girard Fire Insurance of the City of PhiladelphiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. White v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Benninger v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Lagomarsino v. San Jose Abstract & Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Elliano v. Assurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Dickinson v. General Accident Fire & Life Assur. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  5. C. F. Bolster Co. v. J. C. Boespflug Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API