Legal Opinion

Lagomarsino v. San Jose Abstract & Title Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 29, 1960No. Civ. 18516PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

The trial court’s judgment sustaining respondent title company’s attempt to avoid the risks it had purportedly assumed when it issued the instant policy of title insurance generates this appeal. Appellant presents a threefold claim of reversible error: (1) paragraphs two, six and nine of the stipulations of the policy do not apply to this factual situation; (2) the court failed to make a finding upon the material issue of whether or not respondent was barred from raising the statute of limitations; and (3) the court failed to make a finding on the property encompassed in the policy…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Logan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. James v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Neal v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API