Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co. v. Buford

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 17, 1930No. 339PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question; Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co: v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180,183,184; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 326, 334.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zucht v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Sugarman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Sayward v. DennySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Roe v. Kansas Ex Rel. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Wabash Railroad v. FlanniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Village of Riverwoods v. Department of TransportationIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ex Parte BullenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. United States v. State of AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1966
  4. United States v. State of AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1966
  5. Wickton v. Louisville & N. R.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API