United States v. State of Alabama
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1ConcurrenceJohnson, District Judge
(specially concurring):
The evidence in this case fully justifies and requires a declaration that the Alabama poll tax in its original purpose and effect and in its continued application and effect disfranchised and disfranchises Negroes in the exercise of their right to vote; the tax clearly violates the Fifteenth Amendment. I do, therefore, join with Judge Rives in so holding. However, in my opinion, the fundamental issue in this case and one that should be decided prior to reaching the Fifteenth Amendment issue is whether any tax levied on voting and carrying the sanction of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.