Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bullen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 12, 1938No. 1 Div. 7PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The facts upon which the circuit court adjudged the petitioner in contempt were spread upon the minutes of the court and embodied in the judgment, and the soundness of the court’s ruling is presented here for review on petition for the common law writ of certiorari. Ex Parte Boscowitz, 84 Ala. 463, 4. So. 279, 5 Am. St.Rep. 384; Ex Parte Wheeler, Judge, 231 Ala. 356, 165 So. 74.

The facts as disclosed by the return to the writ are that the petitioner at the time of the election being contested and in respect to which he was called and sworn as a witness, was a qualified elector…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chase v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  2. Black v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Finklea v. FarishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Garrett v. CuninghameSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. State ex rel. Spence v. Judge of the Ninth Judicial CircuitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hadnott v. AmosDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1970
  2. Mitchell v. KinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Ex Parte GriffithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. Nora v. NoraSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. State v. AAA Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API