Legal Opinion

Roe v. Kansas Ex Rel. Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 2, 1929No. 63PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

delivered the opinión of the Court.

This writ of error to the Supreme Court of Kansas must be dismissed. The. alleged grounds therefor are so lacking in substance that they may be properly designated as frivolous.

i Plaintiff in error unsuccessfully resisted condemnation by the State of Kansas of the Shawnee Mission, a place held by the court below to possess unusual historical interest. She claims that the legislation under which the proceedings were conducted conflicts with the Fourteenth Amendment and to permit its enforcement will deprive her of property without due process of law. Her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Strickley v. Highland Boy Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Union Lime Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. KempSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Hamilton v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Barnidge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API