Miller v. Monsanto Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Robert A. Miller appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Monsanto Company. Miller alleges that he suffered physical injury and emotional distress caused by Monsanto’s negligence and willful misconduct in the testing of and warnings given with a Monsanto product, which contained polychlori-nated biphenyls (“PCB’s”). Monsanto maintains that Miller failed to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact concerning (1) whether PCB’s were absorbed into Miller’s body and (2) whether PCB’s caused Miller’s injuries.
We affirm.1
ISSUE
The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Gaboury v. Ireland Road Grace Brethren, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Babinchak v. Town of ChestertonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Midwest Commerce Banking Co. v. LivingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bunch v. TiwariIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Henshilwood v. Hendricks CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hayden v. Paragon SteakhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Porter v. Irvin's Interestate Brick & Block, Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Haas Carriage, Inc. v. BernaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.