Curry-Malcolm v. Rochester City Sch. Dist.
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION: MALCOLM III
Plaintiff Bernice Curry-Malcolm ("plaintiff"), proceeding pro se , brings this action *194against defendants Rochester City School District ("RCSD") and its superintendent, Barbara Deane-Williams ("Deane-Williams"). Plaintiff is a 61-year-old African-American woman who was employed with the RCSD starting in April of 2015 as a Central Office Coordinating Administrator of Special Education ("CASE") as a probationary employee. Plaintiff's position was terminated in March 2017 along with twenty-two other CASE employees as a result…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Curry-Malcolm v. RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- Curry-Malcolm v. Rochester City School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Malcolm v. Association of Supervisors and Administrators of Rochester, (ASAR)District Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Malcolm v. Association of Supervisors and Administrators of Rochester, (ASAR)District Court, W.D. New York · 2021