Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Alamance Industries, Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HAYES, District Judge.
The plaintiffs instituted this suit for a declaratory judgment praying for a decree that Patent No. 2,841,971 to Joseph J. Bird, et al. on a compressive stocking be declared invalid and non-infringed, and that the plaintiffs have a decree against the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs in the manufacture of their stockings or their customers who sell them. The defendants in answering alleged the validity of the patent, accused each of the plaintiffs with infringing the patent, asked for an accounting, and in their counterclaim the defendants set up another…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Emle Industries, Inc. v. Patentex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Emle Industries, Inc. v. Patentex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Admiral Corporation v. Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.