Legal Opinion
Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 16, 1975No. C-49451 WHOPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ORRICK, District Judge.
Defendants, Johnson & Johnson (“J & J”) and Ethicon, Inc. (“Ethicon”), moved for summary judgment in this seven year old antitrust action, and plaintiff, Handgards, Inc. (“Handgards”), moved for an order compelling the production of documents. Upon consideration of the lengthy memoranda filed in support of and in opposition to said motions, and the oral argument heard on March 6, 1975, I have concluded that although certain of the predatory acts alleged by Handgards are unsupported in fact, there are genuine issues of material fact as to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Hans Oetiker v. Jurid Werke, G. M. B. HCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Harvey v. Fearless Farris Wholesale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Chromium Industries, Inc. v. Mirror Polishing & Plating Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.