Longstreth v. Cook, Secretary Ark Racing Commission
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtFrank Gr. Smith, J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether Act 46 of the Acts of 1935, p. 90, legalizing pari-mutuel betting on horse races violates § 14 of Art. 19 of the State Constitution and is void for that reason. This section of the Constitution reads as ■ follows: “No lottery shall be authorized by this State, nor shall the sale of lottery tickets be allowed.” This Act 46 of 1935 created the Arkansas Racing Commission, and, among other things, provided that the Commission shall promulgate rules and regulations for horse racing and for the issuance of permits to operate race tracks and licenses…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- People Ex Rel. Ellison v. . LavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- The People v. MonroeIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Burks v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- State ex rel. Sorensen v. Ak-Sar-Ben Exposition Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Scott v. DunawaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- In re AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Oneida County Fair Board v. SmylieIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Ginsberg v. Centennial Turf ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Harding v. City of TexarkanaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.