Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. Centennial Turf Club

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 8, 1952No. 16764PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This case grows out of two separate actions filed in the district court of the City and County of Denver by plaintiff in error against the Centennial Turf Club, Inc. and Mile High Kennel Club, Inc. The two cases involved identical points of law and the controlling matters of fact were very similar. The trial court therefore consolidated them for trial. Middle Park Racing Associationj Rocky Mountain Kennel Club, Inc., and the people of the State of Colorado were made parties upon their several petitions for intervention. We will refer to the parties by name or as they appeared in the trial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Utah State Fair Ass'n v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. The People v. MonroeIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Longstreth v. Cook, Secretary Ark Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Swisher v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  2. State v. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Oneida County Fair Board v. SmylieIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Dominguez v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Barnes v. BaileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API