Legal Opinion

Scott v. Dunaway

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 24, 1958No. 5-1501PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

The question here is whether pari-mutuel betting upon greyhound races violates the constitutional prohibition against lotteries. Ark. Const., Art. 19, § 14. This suit for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief was brought by the appellants, citizens of Crittenden county. The original defendants were the State Racing Commission and the Commissioner of Revenues; Southland Racing Corporation was later brought into the case, after it had received a permit to conduct greyhound racing in Critten-den county. See Ark. State Racing Com’n v. Southland Racing Corp., 226 Ark. 995, 295 S. W. 2d 617.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Longstreth v. Cook, Secretary Ark Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  2. Arkansas State Racing Com'n v. Southland Rac. Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Parker v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Oneida County Fair Board v. SmylieIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Cox v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Barnes v. BaileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. Christian Civic Action Committee v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API