Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sorensen v. Ak-Sar-Ben Exposition Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1929No. 27083PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is a suit in equity brought originally in the supreme court by the state of Nebraska on the relation of the attorney general, plaintiff, for an injunction preventing the Ak-Sar-Ben Exposition Company, defendant, its agents, officers, servants and employees from conducting a game of chance, a lottery and an unlawful betting scheme by means of the pari-mutuel system, or otherwise, in connection with horse racing at the Ak-Sar-Ben race track in Omaha, Douglas county.

The petition, in substance, contains pleas that defendant, among other things, was incorporated to promote and conduct…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Horner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. State v. Pacific Express Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Prout v. Nebraska Home Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  5. United States v. FulkersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Longstreth v. Cook, Secretary Ark Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State v. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Oneida County Fair Board v. SmylieIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API