Legal Opinion

Finkelstein v. Department of Revenue

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1945No. Docket No. 21, Calendar No. 43,016PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This is an appeal by Dora Finkelstein, doing business as Pure Food Dairy,' from a judgment of the court of claims of no cause of action for the recovery of certain sales tax moneys paid by her under protest.

Plaintiff, Dora Finkelstein, conducted a wholesale and retail grocery business in the city of Hamtramck. Under date of July 1, 1942, the department of revenue issued its notice of intention to make an assessment against plaintiff as provided in the general sales tax act, Act No. 167, § 22, Pub. Acts 1933 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, §3663-22, Stat. Ann. §7.543). On July 16, 1942, plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dahrooge v. Rochester German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Sweetser v. FoxUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Metzen v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bigelow v. OtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Summar v. Besser Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. VivianMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Estate of Jacob Chubb v. Daimler Trucks N.A., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  4. Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API