Legal Opinion

Bigelow v. Otis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 71, Calendar No. 37,747PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

In 1927 plaintiff purchased some bonds from defendants Otis & Company, through their agent Hayden. The bonds had not been accepted for filing by the Michigan securities commission as provided by the blue sky law, Act No. 220, Pub. Acts 1923. In 1932 plaintiff commenced this suit for rescission of the purchase and recovery of the price paid. His declaration is planted upon the statute, but contains the further allegation that plaintiff, at the time of purchase, did not know the law had not been complied with and, “due to the fraudulent concealment of this fact and the withholding from him by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bement v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Rodman v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Taylor v. Cranberry Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Dahrooge v. Rochester German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Rugland v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Holland v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Maki v. George R. Cooke Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. Lambert v. CalhounMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Guastello v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Rawlins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API