Legal Opinion

Beazell v. Kane

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1954No. Civ. 20110PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment for $2,500 based upon defendant’s agreement to pay “$4,500 to broker named herein, or one-half of buyer’s deposit, if buyer shall be in default, but not to exceed the full amount of his commission.”

The purchasers (Mr. and Mrs. Gelber) had signed the agreement on September 21, 1951, and presented a check for $5,000 to respondent “to apply on purchase price of $100,000 for 14 unit Apartments.” The Gelbers were ready, willing and able to buy at the time; appellant accepted them as buyers, and in writing agreed “to sell ... on above terms and to pay a commission of $4500.00…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Phelps v. PruschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Edwards v. BillowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lipton v. JohansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Clark v. Dulien Steel Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Mendiondo v. GreitmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Born v. KoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Wright v. BuzzineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Bay Shore Homes, Inc. v. San Diego Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Justice v. AckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Long Beach Memorial Medical Center v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API