Justice v. Ackerman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by defendants from an adverse judgment in an action to recover a broker’s commission on the sale of a bowling alley, saloon, and restaurant.
The only question for decision is whether the evidence supports the finding that “plaintiff was the effective and procuring cause of the sale,” in other words, that plaintiff produced purchasers able, ready, and willing to buy.
Defendants, as partners, were the owners of a bowling alley business consisting of a liquor license, stock in trade, fixtures, equipment, and good will. On January 21,1957, defend ants gave plaintiff an exclusive…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Phelps v. PruschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Austin v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Beazell v. KaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Vidler v. De BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
3Cited by1 opinion
- Total Coverage, Inc. v. Cendant Settlement Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007