Legal Opinion

Wright v. Buzzine

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1960No. Civ. 18505PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

The superior court, after a jury trial, rendered judgment against appellant real estate brokers’ claim for commissions in the amount of $50,000, arising from an exchange of ranch properties, which was induced by the buyer’s fraudulent misrepresentations. The court instructed the jury that even if the brokers acted in good faith, the buyer’s misrepresentations precluded their recovery. As we shall point out, we do not believe that the brokers earned their commissions by securing a buyer who induced the acceptance of the transaction by fraud, and we uphold the instruction. Nor do we find…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. People v. GeibelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Edwards v. BillowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Producers Fruit Co. v. GoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Kidwell v. KetlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meadows v. BierschwaleTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Merrill v. Allen (In Re Universal Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1986
  3. Devereaux v. HarperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Weber v. DobynsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Lewis v. UptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API