Legal Opinion
Continental Insurance v. McKain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 14, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-0296PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOHN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”) and defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (“Aetna”) have filed this supplemental joint motion for summary judgment on the remaining outstanding issue in the case. This court’s order dated February 22, 1993, in response to the insurers’ prior motions for summary judgment, required both Continental and Aetna to indemnify Jefferson Duncan and to defend him in the underlying suits filed in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. In the briefs for those motions, neither Continental nor Aetna…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Blue Anchor Overall Co. v. Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Ralph R. Riehl, Jr. v. Travelers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Casualty Co. of Reading v. Phico InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Hoffmaster v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Continental Cas. Co. v. United Pacific Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Berlin v. Maryland Casualty Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County2002
- Continental Insurance Company v. McKain (Judy L., Robert), Weidinger (Nancy), Duncan (Jefferson), Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Allstate Insurance Company, Pennsylvania National Insurance Companies, A/K/A Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994