Legal Opinion

Ralph R. Riehl, Jr. v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 12, 1985No. 84-3675PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

Ralph Riehl, Jr., sought a declaration that certain insurance policies issued by the Travelers Insurance Company covered the expenses of cleaning up a toxic waste dump site located on his property. The site has been found to be releasing toxic pollutants into neighboring surface and ground waters. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Riehl, declaring Travelers to be obligated to pay the costs of clean-up of the site “attributable to the applicable coverage period.” Because material issues of fact are in dispute, we reverse the order…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. Ness v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. Porter v. American Optical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Zurich Insurance Company the Travelers Indemnity Co. The American Home Assurance Company Commercial Union Insurance Company the Home Insurance Company Underwriter's at Lloyd's of London. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Certain Insurance Companies in the London Market, Referred to in This Action as "Jackson and Companies", ( Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) in No. 95-3432. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Zurich Insurance Company the Travelers Indemnity Co. The American Home Assurance Company Commercial Union Insurance Company the Home Insurance Company Underwriters's at Lloyd's of London Certain Insurance Companies in the London Market, Referred to in This Action as "Jackson and Companies." ( Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) Koppers Company, Inc., in No. 95-3461Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Coolspring Stone Supply, Inc. v. American States Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Wickland Oil Terminals, a California Corporation v. Asarco, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, and State Lands Commission of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. In the Matter of Reading Company, Debtor. United States of America, in 95-1987. In the Matter of Reading Company, Debtor. Consolidated Rail Corporation, in 95-1988Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API