Legal Opinion
United States v. Skeddle
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 11, 1996No. 3:95CR736PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This is a criminal ease in which the defendants are charged with mail and wire fraud, money laundering, and tax evasion. The charges are based on several incidents of undisclosed self-dealing by three of the defendants (Skeddle, Costin, and Bryant) (the defendants), who at the time of the transactions were senior officers of Libbey-OwensFord Company (LOF). The government alleges that those activities violated the defendants’ fiduciary duties to LOF and caused LOF to lose several million dollars.
Throughout the course of this case, the defendants have contended that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Paul Bender, George and Diane Decarlo v. Southland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gamboa v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Duramax Diesel Litig. Andrei Fenner v. Gen. Motors, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Antioch Litigation Trust v. McDermott Will & Emery LLPDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- De Boer Structures (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Shaffer Tent & Awning Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- United States v. SkeddleDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.