Legal Opinion
Antioch Litigation Trust v. McDermott Will & Emery LLP
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 27, 2010No. 2:09-mj-00218PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 16) BE DENIED
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This civil action is currently before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 16) and the parties’ responsive memoranda (Docs. 18,19).
Defendant McDermott Will & Emery LLP (“MWE”) asserts three grounds for dismissal pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a) and 12(b)(6): (1) the Trust’s claims are time-barred to the extent they arise out of MWE’s representation of Antioch with respect to the Antioch ESOP and related ERISA and tax matters; (2) the transfer of the Debtor’s professional…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS, USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Gunasekera v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ajuba International, L.L.C. v. SahariaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Maas v. MaasOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Accelerated Sys. Integration Inc. v. Ritzler, Coughlin & Swansiger, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Capital City Energy Group, Inc. v. Judge Algenon L. Marbley Kelley Drye & Warren, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Antioch Co. Litigation Trust v. Morgan (In Re Antioch Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.