Heup v. Heup
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
In its opinion, the trial court took particular care to set forth why he believed the testimony of the plaintiff and did not believe the testimony of the defendant where their testimony was in conflict. From a review of the record, this court cannot say as a matter of law the trial court was in error in its determination of credibility; therefore, we accept the facts as found by the trial court.
In respect to the annulment claim, the trial court held in its decision, “no fraud has been established; and the request of the defendant for an annulment cannot be granted.” In regard to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Walber v. WalberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Heffernan v. HeffernanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Winner v. WinnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Gauer v. GauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Mentzel v. MentzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lacey v. LaceyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970