Legal Opinion

Heffernan v. Heffernan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1965PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The defendant sets forth the following contentions upon this appeal: (1) The evidence is insufficient to grant a legal separation, (2) the division of estate is inadequate, (3) permanent alimony should have been awarded, (4) the interest on the $15,000 deposited in court during the pendency of the appeal should be paid to defendant, and (5) the plaintiff should have been found in contempt of court for violation of a temporary order.

As to all of the issues raised by the defendant upon this appeal, her burden is substantial. She must either show that the findings of the trial court are against…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kronforst v. KronforstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Caldwell v. CaldwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Gordon v. GordonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Trowbridge v. TrowbridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Hiecke v. HieckeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Walber v. WalberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Perrenoud v. PerrenoudWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Gauer v. GauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Massen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Strandberg v. StrandbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API