Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Connecticut, Department of Corrections
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 28, 2005No. CIV.A.303-CV-1129JCHPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 18]
HALL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bruce Johnson brings this employment discrimination action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e), et seq. (“Title VII”), and § 42 U.S.C. § 1981(a), against his former employer, the Department of Corrections of the State of Connecticut (“DOC”). The defendant moves for summary judgment, claiming that there is no issue of material fact concerning the circumstances of Johnson’s termination and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. For the reasons stated below, the defendant’s motion is GRANTED…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Benedith v. Malverne Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Farrar v. Town of StratfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Rivers v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Siuzdak v. SessionsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Ludwiczak v. Hitachi Capital America Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.