Legal Opinion
Siuzdak v. Sessions
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 21, 2018No. 3:14–cv–01543 (VAB)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR A. BOLDEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Kurt Siuzdak, ("Plaintiff") has sued the Honorable Jefferson B. Sessions III ("Defendant") under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. ; the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a ; the Age Discrimination In Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. ; and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791 and 794 alleging that that the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") retaliated against him for engaging in protected activity. ECF No. 42.1
*82Defendant now moves for summary judgment under Federal…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Boucher v. Trustees of Canisius CollegeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023
- Castro v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Daniels v. Hofstra UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Gupte v. Uber TechnologyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Miceli v. MehrDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.