Legal Opinion
Robison v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1968No. Civ. 24434PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment in a mandamus proceeding whereby they sought to invalidate an “Exception To Use” permit granted by defendants City of Oakland and its council.
In. 1964, the owners of approximately 70 acres of property located in the North Oakland hills (and hereafter referred to as the “Hiller-Bothin property”) filed an application to rezone said property from “A” (One-Family District) to “B” (Medium Density Residential District). They also filed an application to construct a planned unit development on said property. On August 25, 1964, after the Oakland City…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tustin Heights Assn. v. BD. OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Cow Hollow Improvement Club v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Moss v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Tush v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stoddard v. EdelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Hamilton v. Bd. of Supervisors of Santa Barbara Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1969