Legal Opinion

Moss v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1968No. Civ. 32111PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Los Angeles (hereafter sometimes referred to as “Board”) and the City of Los Angeles (hereafter referred to as “City”) to execute, file and distribute the findings prepared by a secretary for the Board, in an appeal from a determination made by a zoning administrator.

Respondents are the owners of a three-acre parcel of vacant land located at or near the southwesterly corner of Burbank and Balboa Boulevards in the San Fernando Valley area of the city and presently…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mahler v. EbySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Essick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Swars v. Council of City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. California Motor Transport Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Orinda Homeowners Committee v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Robison v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API