Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Bd. of Supervisors of Santa Barbara Cty.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 1969No. Civ. 32313PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
The real party in interest owns a tract of real property, located on Channel Drive in Montecito, Santa Barbara County, on which it has for many years operated a cottage-type hotel (The Santa Barbara Biltmore) as a “nonconforming” pre-zoning use and under a conditional use permit heretofore granted to it pursuant to section 9 of Santa Barbara Ordinance No. 453. In 1966, it applied to the Santa Barbara Planning Commission for a “variance” and a Conditional Use Permit, to enable it to construct an 88-foot addition to the hotel building. The staff of the commission recommended denial of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Broadway Laguna, Vallejo Ass'n v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Robison v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
3Cited by13 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- McMillan v. American General Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Stoddard v. EdelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Stolman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Monaco v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.