Legal Opinion

United States v. Barajas-Alvarado

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2011No. 10-50134PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

To convict an alien criminal defendant of illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326, 1 the government must prove that the alien left the United States under order of exclusion, deportation, or removal, and then illegally reentered. In United States v. Mendozar-Lopez, the Supreme Court held that a criminal defendant has a Fifth Amendment right to “some meaningful review” of a prior administrative proceeding that resulted in the exclusion, deportation, or removal order used as a predicate to a § 1326 offense. 481 U.S. 828, 837-38, 107 S.Ct. 2148, 95 L.Ed.2d 772 (1987).…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Mario Ruvalcaba-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Reyes-BonillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Edwin FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Venancio Rojas-PedrozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API