United States v. Barajas-Alvarado
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
To convict an alien criminal defendant of illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326, 1 the government must prove that the alien left the United States under order of exclusion, deportation, or removal, and then illegally reentered. In United States v. Mendozar-Lopez, the Supreme Court held that a criminal defendant has a Fifth Amendment right to “some meaningful review” of a prior administrative proceeding that resulted in the exclusion, deportation, or removal order used as a predicate to a § 1326 offense. 481 U.S. 828, 837-38, 107 S.Ct. 2148, 95 L.Ed.2d 772 (1987).…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Mario Ruvalcaba-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Reyes-BonillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Edwin FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Venancio Rojas-PedrozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.