Legal Opinion

SOLIMENO v. Yonan

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 18, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 09-0139PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOWNIE, Judge.

¶ 1 Abdullah M. Yonan, M.D., Nawal P. Yonan, and Phoenix Medical Group, P.C. (“defendants”) challenge the superior court’s order that they pay attorneys’ fees and costs as a sanction for a mistrial declared after the court found they violated pretrial disclosure requirements. We affirm and hold that a medical malpractice defendant who also testifies as a standard of care expert is subject to expert disclosure requirements regarding that issue. We also hold that a party who causes a mistrial may, under appropriate circumstances, be assessed monetary sanctions under Arizona…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Villa De Jardines Ass'n v. Flagstar Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. Stafford v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. Leflet v. Redwood Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API