Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Pipe Line Co. v. Lindsey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1925No. 16215PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

The circumstances out of which this case arose are substantially as follows: The Oklahoma Pipe Line Company was engaged in laying a pipe line and constructing houses, pumping stations, etc., near the town of Bokchito, having in its employ about 160 men. Through its agents it made an oral contract with James B. Slaton to drill a water well; it being understood that he should furnish the drilling rig and the Oklahoma Pipe Line Company should furnish the casing, and he should receive so much per foot for the drilling. Slaton employed others, including the claimant, D. P. Lindsey, to assist him…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Federal Mining & Smelting Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Williams v. BranumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Rahoutis v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Taylor v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API