Legal Opinion

Federal Mining & Smelting Co. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1924No. 14726PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This cause comes here on petition for review of - the question in controversy from the State Industrial Commission wherein W. M. Thomas, claim ant, was awarded compensation by said commission at the rate of $17.31 per week for a period of 250 weeks for an injury received by claimant which necessitated the amputation of his arm. The injury was received by the said Thomas while operating a drilling rig, which belonged to the claimant, and he was operating same under a contract with the petitioner herein. Federal Mining & Smelting company, wherein he had been employed by said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Producers' Lumber Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. De Palma v. WeinmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Jensen v. BarbourMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. MaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rahoutis v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Shepard v. CrumbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Central Surety & Insurance Corp. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API